If you register as a "user" of this site, you can leave comments on its content. You cannot create content unless you are a member of the HCEC.
How this site worksUser loginThe HCECNavigationNews from the HCECReceive news, including upcoming events, things you can do and progress made, direct to your email inbox: create an account here, then subscribe here. Who's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 1 guest online.
EcoEarth |
19th Sept: Historic Court Case launched against Anvil Hill!Historic court case seeks to force climate change assessments of new coal mines 19th September, 2006 Newcastle environmentalist Peter Gray has today lodged a court challenge against the controversial Anvil Hill open-cut coal mine on the grounds that there is no consideration of its climate change impacts. The action was taken after repeated refusals by the state government to consider the climate implications of new coal mine proposals, despite Premier Morris Iemma labelling climate change the greatest threat facing our environment and way of life. Centennial’s current Environmental Assessment does not include a full greenhouse assessment. If approved, Anvil Hill will produce up to 10.5 million tonnes of coal a year which, when burnt, will produce more greenhouse pollution that NSW’s entire transport sector of more than four million vehicles. Yet the greenhouse implications of this are ignored in the Government’s approval process. Mr Gray said: “The expansion of coal exports from Newcastle Harbour is fuelling climate change which will devastate NSW. Yet the government refuses to consider this when approving new coal mines. Our action today is designed to force the government to take climate change seriously” “On the one hand Premier Iemma warns us about climate change. Yet on the other he allows new coal mines to open with no consideration of the climate change implications of doing so. This must stop,” Mr Gray said. Link to other pages on this site about Anvil Hill and the case: Background: Save Anvil Hill October: Controversial changes to the Planning Act rushed through by the State Government to thwart the case November: State Government misleading the public about Planning law changes November: Summary of submissions to the Anvil Hill environmental assessment Background to the project
|
SearchUpcoming eventsPopular contentRandom Quote"What's a doona?" |